Professors can participate of the two modalities and have greater teaching load. This allows to greater interoperabilidade of processes, people, of products and methodologies, with great escalabilidade, visibility and reduction of costs. The pupils will be able to choose the model that more to agree to them, will learn more and the institutions will be able to offer an education of quality, dynamic modern and, to a competitive cost. The school is previsible, excessively bureaucratic excessively, little stimulant for the good professors and pupils and complete: ' ' The school is previsible, excessively bureaucratic excessively, little stimulant for the good professors and pupils Is nonsense that the courses almost integrally continue centered in the classroom and that the education in the distance still is seen with diffidence, when not with active resistance. Many areas of knowledge do not admit nor to argue the education in the distance. The necessary education to focar more, together with the intellectual ability and the preparation for the professional success, the construction of freer people each time, evolved, independent and responsible socially.
To learn demands to become involved itself, to search, to go behind, to produce new syntheses fruit of discoveries. The model to pass content and to charge its devolution is insuficiente.' ' 3. Disadvantages of the EAD According to Moran (2002), Education in the distance is not one ' ' fast-food' ' where the pupil if serves soon of something. It is one practical one that he allows to a balance between the necessities and individual abilities and of the group – of actual and virtual form. Maciel (2007) says in them that still in Brazil, it has a preconception in relation new ace pedagogical conceptions, is read, with aid of computer science in a modern context, where information it is part of ' ' capital' ' of the human being, its social value.