In this structure, he must yourself I begin be observed it basic: ' ' to obey professor' '. The professional of Physical Education still possesss a tecnicista vision. For it the pupil must limit only to the gesture technician as a way and end of production to participate of annually carried through esportivas competitions for the Secretariats of Sport or Education. (KUNZ, 1991). Some professionals of Physical Education are not worried about the process education learning of the pupils and yes in giving to its lessons of random form, with its defined techniques and tactics, imposing its rules, limiting the creativity of the pupil. Kunz (1992.p.63) discloses that: the participation of the pupil as subject of its to act in a perspective criticizes of the sport, seen as a daily pay-contributed reality, is not allowed.
It is an education that if imposes, typical of antidialgica pedagogia. For Bracht some basic questions they must be analyzed in the direction to clarify some principles of a pedagogia criticizes for the Physical Education with regard to function of the professors of Physical Education who in the action of its duty, must effectively, to incorporate new positions such as: . They need to surpass the vision of infancy that emphasizes the process of development of the child as natural, and not social; . They need to surpass the positive vision of that the movement is predominantly a motor behavior; . The professors must search the agreement of that, what he will determine the use that the individual will make of the movement; . The new model of education leads to a new socialization, that is, the professors of Physical Education must surpass the idea, much spread out, of that the lessons of Physical Education do not have to speak, that is not if it must seat and argue with the pupils what they are making, under the argument of that the lesson of Physical Education must be ' ' prtica' '.