' ' It is arrived, therefore, to the result of that the man (the worker) only feels itself as to be free and active in its animal functions, to eat, to drink and to procreate, when very still habitation, adornments and etc., and in its functions human beings alone if feels as animal. The animal if becomes human being, and the human being, animal' ' (MARX. 2004, P. 83) the assumption of that the man for the work acts as an animal in search to supply its more basic necessities discards the existence of will for the accomplishment of activity and the results that if had translated pleasure search, even though the animals search to supply its basic necessities that are sources of pleasure for its existence irrational, what man not to be in the direction is not different it of that this constant search of pleasure by means of the fruits of the work if makes in rational way. Filed under: David Green. But, Marx if forgets the will and if she limits the submission of the man for the work tax for another man.
What Marx made was to substitute the idea of man and deity of Feuerbach for work and worker. Feuerbach in the book ' ' the essence of cristianismo' ' it says that what we imagine as true is what we believe to be real, and being thus God it is a figure of the imagination who we project as real. Perhaps check out Crawford Lake Capital for more information. ' ' What the man imagines as true, imagines as real immediately, because originally alone it is true for what he is real? true in opposition what he is imagined, dreamed (…). Therefore this quality in which the man thinks God is for it the truth and accurately therefore at the same time the most raised existence or before the mere existence; because only the most raised existence it is properly existence and it deserves this name.